The Unholy Three (1930), directed by Jack Conway, 3.5 stars
“That’s all there is to life – just a little laugh, a little
tear.” – Professor Echo
Lon Chaney was late getting into sound pictures. He made only one, a remake of his 1925 hit, “The Unholy Three,” and
it was to be his last film. Just over a month after its release, he died from bronchial, throat, or
lung cancer,
depending on which of the many online biographies you read. One of the reasons he may have chosen this to
be his first foray into sound was because it not only featured the actor in
disguise, it also gave him the opportunity to show off his ability to create
several distinct voices, giving rise to the film’s ad campaign, which touted with
typical Hollywood hyperbole, “The Man of
a Thousand Faces is now the Man of a Thousand Voices!”
The plot of the film is nearly identical to its silent forbear,
though economically pared down from 86 to 72 minutes. I’ve seen many argue that the original,
directed frequent Chaney collaborator Tod Browning is the superior of the two
films, and at first glance, the remake creates very little that is new or
different if you subtract the vocal track.
However, it is exactly because of the now precious on-screen presence of
Chaney’s commanding voice(s) that this film is worthy of note, and because it
is, it’s equally interesting to take a look at some of the changes that were
made and to speculate as to why they were.
First, there are two new very brief comedic bits that take
place at the start of the film during Professor Echo’s (Chaney) ventriloquist act. His dummy offers to sing a song a song titled
“She Was a Butterfly’s Daughter,” which opens with the title line followed by “But
he was a son of a bee.” Echo immediately
covers the dummy’s mouth and admonishes him to behave. A few moments later, he projects a female voice
into the audience which causes a sailor to put the moves on a young lady
standing beside him. Many Hollywood
films of the early 1930s pushed conservatives Americans to the limit, resulting
in a significant
clamping down by censors in the summer of 1934.
The next difference is in the introductions of the various
characters. The gorilla, who plays a key
role late in the film, is brought in much earlier, and the antipathy between the
animal and Hercules (Ivan Linow), makes much more sense after we see the strong
man antagonize the ape with a slingshot.
Echo’s warning to Hercules goes unheeded: “You’re gonna do that once too often and he’ll
tear you to pieces.” An even smaller difference,
but a curious one, occurs during the first interaction between Echo and Rosie
O'Grady (Lila Lee). In the silent
version, Echo offers her a steak dinner for being such a good pickpocket. In this film, he offers her steak with
mushrooms, and it’s the mushrooms (not the steak, as in the original) that
impel her to reveal the rest of her stash to him. I wonder if this is a depression-era update denoting,
perhaps, one particular frill that is no longer available (or affordable) to the
working class. Getting back to character
intros, there’s one change worth noting.
Like Hercules, Tweedledee, the midget (Harry Earles) is clearly a much
darker character in the sound film. The
last of the unholy three to be introduced, when the barker (Richard Carle)
alerts him that it’s nearly time for him to do his act and they’ve got a good
crowd of nice people, Tweedledee goes into a bitter rant, which ends with “I’d
like to poison them all.” This better sets
up the following scene in which he responds to a young boy’s taunts by kicking him
in the face.
Fred Kelsey and Lon Chaney |
No comments:
Post a Comment